Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules
Date: 2006-05-31 17:24:59
Message-ID: 20060531172459.GG23169@svana.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:14:27AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Is it worth adding a module name to the magic block, or should we just
> leave well enough alone?  It's certainly not something foreseen as part
> of the purpose of that block.  In the absence of some fairly concrete
> ideas what to do with it, I'm probably going to vote keep-it-simple.

I actually considered it while writing the patch but decided against
given the general tendancy against putting extra info into the modules
in general...

Personally I think it's a good idea, except: where is this info going
to be displayed or used?

Have a nice day,
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2006-05-31 17:26:47
Subject: Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-05-31 17:17:35
Subject: Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Joachim WielandDate: 2006-05-31 17:58:16
Subject: Re: Allow commenting of variables in postgresql.conf to - try2
Previous:From: Zdenek KotalaDate: 2006-05-31 16:13:04
Subject: Re: Allow commenting of variables in postgresql.conf to -

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group