| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules |
| Date: | 2006-05-31 17:24:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20060531172459.GG23169@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:14:27AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Is it worth adding a module name to the magic block, or should we just
> leave well enough alone? It's certainly not something foreseen as part
> of the purpose of that block. In the absence of some fairly concrete
> ideas what to do with it, I'm probably going to vote keep-it-simple.
I actually considered it while writing the patch but decided against
given the general tendancy against putting extra info into the modules
in general...
Personally I think it's a good idea, except: where is this info going
to be displayed or used?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2006-05-31 17:26:47 | Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-31 17:17:35 | Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joachim Wieland | 2006-05-31 17:58:16 | Re: Allow commenting of variables in postgresql.conf to - try2 |
| Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2006-05-31 16:13:04 | Re: Allow commenting of variables in postgresql.conf to - |