Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] Add support for GnuTLS

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for GnuTLS
Date: 2006-05-31 09:33:59
Message-ID: 200605310933.k4V9XxZ02990@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > FWIW, Red Hat's legal department thinks that the FSF has "overreached"
> > in claiming that the GPL is incompatible with OpenSSL's license.  Which
> > is why Red Hat isn't worrying about GPL apps that use OpenSSL, of which
> > there are quite a few ...
> >
> >   
> I'm quite happy if we hang onto Red Hat's coat tails on this one.
> 
> Do we use any GPL libraries other than libreadline? It would be nice to 
> be able to get out of this game altogether - getting libedit up to 
> scratch and portable would be very nice, and I know for a fact that 
> commercial postgres vendors would welcome such a development.

Agreed, but FYI GnuTLS is LGPL, not GPL.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Marko KreenDate: 2006-05-31 10:08:41
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules
Previous:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2006-05-31 06:44:16
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group