Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date?

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date?
Date: 2006-05-31 07:22:20
Message-ID: 20060531072220.GD23169@svana.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:35:12AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> FWIW, it looks like a large part of the bloat in the newer file is
> in-line documentation, which we hardly need to include in our
> distribution.  I'll leave it to someone more familiar with Perl to
> determine whether we want to try to use a slimmed-down copy of the
> up-to-date output.

Not sure whether it's worth it, but this sed line strips the POD docs:

sed -e '/^=/,/^=cut/d' < ppport.h

Have a nice day,
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2006-05-31 07:28:47
Subject: Re: PQescapeIdentifier
Previous:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2006-05-31 06:44:16
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group