On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:20:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now that the magic-block patch is in, we need to revisit this bit of the
> discussion. I'm for making lack of a magic block an ERROR immediately.
> I don't see the point of waiting; in fact, if we wait till freeze we'll
> just make the breakage more concentrated. At the very least it ought
> to be a WARNING immediately, because a LOG message is just not visible
If you like I can send a patch that adds it to all of contrib and some
of the other places required so that make check passes...
Have a nice day,
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Martijn van Oosterhout||Date: 2006-05-31 07:22:20|
|Subject: Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date?|
|Previous:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2006-05-31 06:30:03|
|Subject: Re: LinkedIn|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-05-31 09:33:59|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for GnuTLS|
|Previous:||From: uol||Date: 2006-05-30 22:54:19|
|Subject: Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection|