Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules
Date: 2006-05-31 06:44:16
Message-ID: 20060531064416.GA23169@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:20:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now that the magic-block patch is in, we need to revisit this bit of the
> discussion. I'm for making lack of a magic block an ERROR immediately.
> I don't see the point of waiting; in fact, if we wait till freeze we'll
> just make the breakage more concentrated. At the very least it ought
> to be a WARNING immediately, because a LOG message is just not visible
> enough.

If you like I can send a patch that adds it to all of contrib and some
of the other places required so that make check passes...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-05-31 07:22:20 Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date?
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2006-05-31 06:30:03 Re: LinkedIn

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-31 09:33:59 Re: [PATCH] Add support for GnuTLS
Previous Message uol 2006-05-30 22:54:19 Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection