Re: full vacuum - resources - scaling

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Mr(dot) Dan" <bitsandbytes88(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: full vacuum - resources - scaling
Date: 2006-05-30 14:10:31
Message-ID: 20060530141031.GA30857@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Mr. Dan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed that my full vacuum and re-index script is taking a day and
> a half instead of 1/2 day.
> Recently, the size of my database cluster has doubled to 130 GB. Would
> anyone recommend increasing one or more of these to help get my full
> vacuums to run a little faster?

I guess the question is why are you running vacuum full at all. Plain
vacuum should suffice, provided the FSM settings are enough for your
database:

> maxfsmpages 480001 (6 bytes each)
> maxfsmrelations 30000 (70 bytes each)

max_fsm_pages at 480000 are enough to cover 3 GB, if my math is correct.
It may be enough or it may not, depending on the dynamics of your data.

Also with non-full vacuum you may be able to get away with vacuuming
some tables more often.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergiusz Jarczyk 2006-05-30 14:17:57 Re: Problem building initdb on sparc10
Previous Message Averbukh Stella 2006-05-30 14:00:10 Re: Problem building initdb on sparc10