| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mr(dot) Dan" <bitsandbytes88(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: full vacuum - resources - scaling |
| Date: | 2006-05-30 14:10:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20060530141031.GA30857@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Mr. Dan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed that my full vacuum and re-index script is taking a day and
> a half instead of 1/2 day.
> Recently, the size of my database cluster has doubled to 130 GB. Would
> anyone recommend increasing one or more of these to help get my full
> vacuums to run a little faster?
I guess the question is why are you running vacuum full at all. Plain
vacuum should suffice, provided the FSM settings are enough for your
database:
> maxfsmpages 480001 (6 bytes each)
> maxfsmrelations 30000 (70 bytes each)
max_fsm_pages at 480000 are enough to cover 3 GB, if my math is correct.
It may be enough or it may not, depending on the dynamics of your data.
Also with non-full vacuum you may be able to get away with vacuuming
some tables more often.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergiusz Jarczyk | 2006-05-30 14:17:57 | Re: Problem building initdb on sparc10 |
| Previous Message | Averbukh Stella | 2006-05-30 14:00:10 | Re: Problem building initdb on sparc10 |