Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 5/28/06, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> wrote:
> > With -lpthread
> > lock.enabled 323s
> > lock.disabled 50s
> > lock.unlocked 36s
> I forgot to test with -lpthread, my bad. Indeed by default
> something less expensive that full locking is going on.
> > The crux of the matter is though, if you're calling something a million
> > times, you're better off trying to find an alternative anyway. There is
> > a certain amount of overhead to calling shared libraries and no amount
> > of optimisation of the library is going save you that.
> The crux of the matter was if its possible to use fwrite
> as easy string combining mechanism and the answer is no,
> because it's not lightweight enough.
So your patch to src/backend/storage/file/fd.c should be discarded? OK.
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-05-30 01:29:08|
|Subject: Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention|
|Previous:||From: PFC||Date: 2006-05-29 22:10:43|
|Subject: Re: pg_proc probin misuse|