Re: SQL Question

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com
Cc: "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL Question
Date: 2006-05-25 03:30:40
Message-ID: 20060525033040.GA16170@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 15:06:53 -0700,
operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com wrote:
>
> given this structure, and hopefully i've communicated
> it well enough, i'm concerned that it might be
> difficult to weed out qa 1 fail followed by qa 2 pass.
>
> that is...
>
> qa test 1
> fail
>
> ... the bizrre happens ...
>
> qa test 2
> pass
>
> how can i go about finding the qa test 1 failure?
>
> if i did a inspect_date descending query with a limit
> of 1, i'd get a pass and miss the failure.

Use "inspect_pass" in the WHERE clause.

In response to

  • SQL Question at 2006-05-24 22:06:53 from operationsengineer1

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message operationsengineer1 2006-05-25 20:56:09 Re: SQL Question - Almost, Not Quite...
Previous Message operationsengineer1 2006-05-24 22:06:53 SQL Question