Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>, John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date: 2006-05-20 00:19:48
Message-ID: 200605200019.k4K0JmX13852@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
> > Fortunately for us, MySQL foster open development, which
> > means they will never catch us in the long run.

Sorry, I meant to say:

  Fortunately for us, MySQL _do_ _not_ foster open development, which
  means they will never catch us in the long run.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-05-20 00:25:17
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats.
Previous:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2006-05-19 23:53:10
Subject:

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2006-05-20 06:23:21
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-05-19 23:05:53
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group