Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: why is bitmap index chosen for this query?

From: "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why is bitmap index chosen for this query?
Date: 2006-05-18 20:16:14
Message-ID: 20060518201614.GA8640@uio.no (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 12:53:16PM -0700, Stephen Byers wrote:
> Yes, here are the runtimes for the repeated query.
>   Total runtime: 748716.750 ms
> Total runtime: 749170.934 ms
> Total runtime: 744113.594 ms
> Total runtime: 746314.251 ms
> Total runtime: 742083.732 ms

With which options enabled? This isn't even close to any of the three times
you already posted.

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Stephen ByersDate: 2006-05-18 20:26:26
Subject: Re: why is bitmap index chosen for this query?
Previous:From: Stephen ByersDate: 2006-05-18 19:53:16
Subject: Re: why is bitmap index chosen for this query?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group