| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Mention pg_dump version portability |
| Date: | 2006-05-15 23:43:20 |
| Message-ID: | 200605152343.k4FNhK703441@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 12:21:06PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have applied this patch that mentions pg_dump portability to 8.1.X and
> > CVS HEAD.
>
> Would it be worth recommending using the custom format over plain? I see
> plenty of issues with incompatabilities in the plain version, but I
> don't think I've ever seen problem with the custom format (though this
> could just be because everyone uses the default...)
Right, it is just because it is the default.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-16 18:46:33 | Re: Mention pg_dump version portability |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-15 20:23:54 | Re: Mention pg_dump version portability |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-16 00:12:06 | Re: Compression and on-disk sorting |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-05-15 22:46:32 | Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection? |