| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | stange(at)rentec(dot)com, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: solaris build problem with Sun compilers |
| Date: | 2006-05-11 23:34:18 |
| Message-ID: | 200605112334.k4BNYIK05104@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-ports |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Uh, backend/port/tas/solaris*.s ASM files have "section" like:
> > .section ".text"
> > Are these OK? I didn't see you report any problems with these.
>
> Well, that's an interesting point ... I wonder what the version in
> s_lock.c is used for at all? Maybe it's dead code.
Uh, I am kind of confused myself. I thought it was calling the ASM
file, but there is no x86 there so that can't be true.
I think the big question is what uses tas_dummy(). I only see it
referenced in s_lock.c.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-11 23:48:08 | Re: solaris build problem with Sun compilers |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-11 23:23:12 | Re: solaris build problem with Sun compilers |