On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:55:15AM +0200, Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD wrote:
> > 0.101 ms BEGIN
> > 1.451 ms CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE tmp ( a INTEGER NOT NULL, b INTEGER
> > NULL, c TIMESTAMP NOT NULL, d INTEGER NOT NULL ) ON COMMIT DROP
> 1.4 seconds is not great for create table, is that what we expect ?
Hmm, I'm hoping ms means milliseconds...
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Ketema Harris||Date: 2006-05-11 12:57:48|
|Subject: Nested Loops vs. Hash Joins or Merge Joins|
|Previous:||From: Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD||Date: 2006-05-11 07:55:15|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Zdenek Kotala||Date: 2006-05-11 11:59:46|
|Subject: Re: Bug in signal handler [Was: [TODO] Allow commenting|
|Previous:||From: Volkan YAZICI||Date: 2006-05-11 08:25:30|
|Subject: Re: intarray internals|