Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>,Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal
Date: 2006-05-11 08:30:25
Message-ID: 20060511083025.GE30113@svana.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:55:15AM +0200, Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD wrote:
> > 0.101 ms BEGIN
> > 1.451 ms CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE tmp ( a INTEGER NOT NULL, b INTEGER
> NOT  
> > NULL, c TIMESTAMP NOT NULL, d INTEGER NOT NULL ) ON COMMIT DROP
> 
> 1.4 seconds is not great for create table, is that what we expect ?

Hmm, I'm hoping ms means milliseconds...
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Ketema HarrisDate: 2006-05-11 12:57:48
Subject: Nested Loops vs. Hash Joins or Merge Joins
Previous:From: Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SDDate: 2006-05-11 07:55:15
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Zdenek KotalaDate: 2006-05-11 11:59:46
Subject: Re: Bug in signal handler [Was: [TODO] Allow commenting
Previous:From: Volkan YAZICIDate: 2006-05-11 08:25:30
Subject: Re: intarray internals

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group