| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christian Kratzer <ck(at)cksoft(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal |
| Date: | 2006-05-10 18:40:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20060510184035.GN99570@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:33:42AM +0200, PFC wrote:
> - Repeating the query might yield different results if records were
> added or deleted in the meantime.
BTW, SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL serializeable or BEGIN ISOLATION
LEVEL serializeable would cure that.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2006-05-10 18:46:41 | [TODO] Allow commenting of variables ... |
| Previous Message | Mark Wong | 2006-05-10 16:55:13 | Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-10 19:00:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2006-05-10 18:10:51 | Re: UNSUBSCRIBE |