| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: French PDF manual |
| Date: | 2006-05-09 12:16:19 |
| Message-ID: | 200605091416.20609.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Am Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 13:40 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> I have a counter-question. What value is there in continuing to use
> SGML?
Tag reduction makes editing easier (for some).
There's the question whether all the files should be renamed to .xml.
Marked sections would need to be replaced with a profiling mechanism. The
mechanisms for this exist but they are not all that elegant.
I'm all in favor of considering a move to XML, but we need to work with the
facts.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-09 13:59:43 | Re: French PDF manual |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-05-09 12:12:41 | Re: French PDF manual |