Re: pgstat: delayed write of stats file

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgstat: delayed write of stats file
Date: 2006-05-07 13:09:17
Message-ID: 200605071309.k47D9HM26331@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > >>> This was not ready to be applied, was it?
> >
> > > I don't recall any specific objections that weren't answered.
> >
> > How about the fact that it's already caused one buildfarm failure?
> >
> > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=wasp&dt=2006
> -04-30%2003:05:01
>
>
> Well, that objection certainly wasn't raised before since it wasn't on
> buildfarm, and it passed the regression tests many times on my systems.
>
> Oh, and apparantly it caused the same issue on firefly. I don't really
> see the connection between these two platforms and why it should happen
> just there, though. Any ideas on that part?

Was this fixed somehow? I don't see any more buildfarm failures, but I
didn't see a fix go in either. It is very possible the pgport fix I did
yesterday is related, but I have not applied it yet.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-07 13:43:21 Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-07 12:58:49 Re: plpython improvements