From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgstat: delayed write of stats file |
Date: | 2006-05-07 13:09:17 |
Message-ID: | 200605071309.k47D9HM26331@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > >>> This was not ready to be applied, was it?
> >
> > > I don't recall any specific objections that weren't answered.
> >
> > How about the fact that it's already caused one buildfarm failure?
> >
> > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=wasp&dt=2006
> -04-30%2003:05:01
>
>
> Well, that objection certainly wasn't raised before since it wasn't on
> buildfarm, and it passed the regression tests many times on my systems.
>
> Oh, and apparantly it caused the same issue on firefly. I don't really
> see the connection between these two platforms and why it should happen
> just there, though. Any ideas on that part?
Was this fixed somehow? I don't see any more buildfarm failures, but I
didn't see a fix go in either. It is very possible the pgport fix I did
yesterday is related, but I have not applied it yet.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-07 13:43:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-07 12:58:49 | Re: plpython improvements |