Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set via

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set via
Date: 2006-05-01 02:58:39
Message-ID: 200605010258.k412wds12624@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Documentation added, patch attached and applied.  Thanks.
> 
> I just got around to reading this patch.  Why is the syntax GRANT CONNECTION
> and not GRANT CONNECT?  Privilege names are generally verbs not nouns.
> Unless someone can point to a good reason for CONNECTION, I'm going to
> change it.

Sounds good, hit the docs too, thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter BrantDate: 2006-05-01 17:15:25
Subject: Re: pgstat: remove delayed destroy / pipe:
Previous:From: Gevik BabakhaniDate: 2006-04-30 22:17:56
Subject: Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group