On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:34:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> 2. Run setRuleCheckAsUser during rule load rather than rule store.
> #2 is a lot simpler, and would fix the problem for existing broken rules
> whereas #1 would not, so I'm kind of inclined to go with that. I doubt
> there'd be any meaningful performance hit --- parsing the stored form
> of a rule is relatively expensive anyway, so we cache the results.
FWIW, I think #2 is better also. It's the easiest way to ensure the
correct result and the performence isn't enough of a problem to worry
about doing it a different way.
Have a nice day,
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-04-30 17:17:15|
|Subject: Re: Altering view ownership doesn't work ... |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-04-30 16:34:42|
|Subject: Altering view ownership doesn't work ...|