On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:06:58PM -0400, Ketema Harris wrote:
> I was wondering if there were any performance issues with having a data
> directory that was an nfs mounted drive? Say like a SAN or NAS device? Has
> anyone done this before?
My understanding is that NFS is pretty poor in performance in general,
so I would expect it to be particularly bad for a DB. You might run
some (non-DB) performance tests to get a feel for how bad it might me.
(Someone once told me that NFS topped out at around 12MB/s, but I don't
know if that's really true [they were trying to sell a competitive
In any event, you're at least limited by ethernet speeds, if not more.
Steve Wampler -- swampler(at)noao(dot)edu
The gods that smiled on your birth are now laughing out loud.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: mark||Date: 2006-04-27 02:56:02|
|Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs|
|Previous:||From: Will Reese||Date: 2006-04-27 02:13:18|
|Subject: Re: Slow deletes in 8.1 when FKs are involved|