On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:27:18AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> If you haven't actually run a heavy benchmark of postgresql on the two
> architectures, please don't make your decision based on other
> benchmarks.  Since you've got both a D920 and an X2 3800, that'd be a
> great place to start.  Mock up some benchmark with a couple dozen
> threads hitting the server at once and see if the Intel can keep up.  It

Or better yet, use dbt* or even pgbench so others can reproduce...
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

• Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs at 2006-04-26 15:27:18 from Scott Marlowe

Responses

• Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs at 2006-04-26 22:16:46 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-performance by date

Next:	From: Jim C. Nasby	Date: 2006-04-26 22:14:47
	Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Previous:	From: Steve Poe	Date: 2006-04-26 20:08:59
	Subject: Re: Introducing a new linux readahead framework