Re: Schema 'public'

From: Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Michael Talbot-Wilson <mtw(at)view(dot)net(dot)au>
Cc: Novice Postgresql-list <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Schema 'public'
Date: 2006-04-19 04:58:15
Message-ID: 20060419045815.41027.qmail@web31803.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Just curious, What "thing" is tell you that "it" is in the public schema?

--- Michael Talbot-Wilson <mtw(at)view(dot)net(dot)au> wrote:

> Is there any way to prevent the thing telling you that it/whatever is
> in the public schema? I find this intrusive. If I were running a
> seat/flight bookings/reservations system for Japan Airlines perhaps I
> wouldn't. But I ain't and I do. I am never going to explicitly use a
> schema. Multiple databases is sufficient for much bigger companies
> than mine.
>
> And I think the term "schema" is bizarre in this context.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Talbot-Wilson 2006-04-19 05:10:36 Re: Schema 'public'
Previous Message Michael Talbot-Wilson 2006-04-19 04:26:39 Schema 'public'