Re: schema-qualified SET CONSTRAINTS

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: schema-qualified SET CONSTRAINTS
Date: 2006-04-18 03:40:33
Message-ID: 200604180340.k3I3eXw21416@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


Based on discussion, it seems the idea of using search path seems
accepted.

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kris Jurka wrote:
>
> The attached patch allows SET CONSTRAINTS to take a schema qualified
> constraint name (myschema.t1_fk_t2) and when given a bare constraint name
> it uses the search_path to determine the matching constraint instead of
> the previous behavior of disabling all identically named constraints.
>
> Kris Jurka

Content-Description:

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message energumen@buaa.edu.cn 2006-04-18 03:59:27 how can i get the binary format of timestamp?
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2006-04-18 02:58:14 Re: Question on win32 semaphore simulation

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-04-18 03:45:24 Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-18 03:36:31 Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file