Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > pg_ctl -D test -U foo start
> > pg_ctl -D test -W start
> > pg_ctl -D test -w stop
> > pg_ctl -D test -l fast stop
> > etc.. (16 possible error combinations in total now checked)
> I object to making these throw an error. It is very convenient to be
> able to alter the command line from start to stop to reload etc.
> without having to remove or rewrite all the options that are not really
> relevant for that particular operation.
For a command as significant as pg_ctl, I can't see how making it
_convenient_ is a good argument.
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2006-04-17 19:01:46|
|Subject: Re: pg_ctl options checking|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2006-04-17 17:09:51|
|Subject: Re: Documentation patch: change a name in a grammar rule|