Re: Additional current timestamp values

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> >>> "statement" isn't a great name for the units
> >>> that we are actually processing. We're really wanting to do these
> >>> things once per client command, or maybe per client query would be
> >>> a better name.
> >>
> >> Right.
>
> > What about "query string"? If you want to include the term "client", I
> > would find "client query string" less confusing than "client command" or
> > "client query".
>
> "Query string" is a term we've used in the past, and it shows up in the
> source code. I could live with that, but I'm not sure if it's got any
> good connotations for people who haven't got their hands dirty in the
> code ...

Peter hammered us quite a bit in the past that we send "statements", not
just queries (aka SELECT). It is hard to argue with that.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +