Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_class catalog question...

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_class catalog question...
Date: 2006-03-31 15:41:18
Message-ID: 20060331154118.GB12579@surnet.cl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 3/31/06, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> wrote:
> > What if you put your char[64] before relhassubclass, then you
> > don't change CLASS_TUPLE_SIZE.
> 
> Thought about that... but it would be an ugly place for this column. 
> I know I could get around it by renumbering the attribute, but that's
> just a kludge.

What are you using a char[64] for anyway?  You should probably consider
using NameData, if you want to store an identifier.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jonah H. HarrisDate: 2006-03-31 15:45:15
Subject: Re: pg_class catalog question...
Previous:From: Jonah H. HarrisDate: 2006-03-31 15:36:22
Subject: Re: pg_class catalog question...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group