| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, bmihajlov(at)yahoo(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Slony-I for circular replication |
| Date: | 2006-03-31 15:35:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20060331153531.GM49405@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 10:15:21AM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> I had to do multi-master replication for a major project and we wound
> up writing our own replication system. The problem is that this sort of
> thing really has to be based on your own business rules. There is no
> way to make it generic. At least, that was the conclusion we came to.
Maybe true, but certainly a lot of the framework should be generic, no?
There's *a lot* of people who ask about multi-master replication.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2006-03-31 15:36:22 | Re: pg_class catalog question... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-31 15:10:13 | Re: WAL dirty-buffer management bug |