Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Index scan startup time

From: "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index scan startup time
Date: 2006-03-30 13:00:41
Message-ID: 20060330130041.GA13732@uio.no (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 02:59:02PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Well, it's logical enough; it scans along activity_id until it finds one
>> with state=10000 or state=10001. You obviously have a _lot_ of records with
>> low activity_id and state none of these two, so Postgres needs to scan all
>> those records before it founds 100 it can output. This is the “startup
>> cost” you're seeing.
> The startup cost is the cost until the plan is set up to start outputting 
> rows.  It is not the time until the first row is found.

Well, point, my terminology was wrong. Still, what you're seeing is endless
scanning for the first row. I don't know your distribution, but are you
really sure state wouldn't have better selectivity?

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Michael StoneDate: 2006-03-30 13:29:17
Subject: Re: Index scan startup time
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-03-30 12:59:02
Subject: Re: Index scan startup time

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group