From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <jberkus(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Ayush Parashar <aparashar(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem |
Date: | 2006-03-25 13:10:18 |
Message-ID: | 20060325131018.GF80726@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:24:00PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> memory. Using too much memory could also impact overall elapsed time
> when we have concurrent users, so the question is should we optimise
> resources for the multi-user case or for the single user case? Where is
> the right balance point?
Sounds like what we need is a GUC... I know I certainly have cases where
I'll take faster and using more memory over the alternative.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John DeSoi | 2006-03-25 13:47:28 | Re: Bytea and perl |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-03-25 13:02:22 | Re: Domains as Subtypes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-25 15:00:51 | Re: Where does the time go? |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-03-25 12:24:00 | Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem |