Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1
Date: 2006-03-01 00:54:12
Message-ID: 200603010054.k210sCg04384@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I will clean it up before applying.

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

	http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Martin Pitt wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hi again,
> 
> Martin Pitt [2006-02-19 14:39 +0100]:
> > Since this changes the behaviour of pg_restore, this should probably
> > become an option, e. g. -D / --ignore-existing-table-data. I'll do
> > this if you agree to the principle of the current patch.
> 
> I improved the patch now to only ignore TABLE DATA for existing tables
> if '-X ignore-existing-tables' is specified. I also updated the
> documentation.
> 
> Since this doesn't change the default behaviour now any more, I would
> like to put this patch into the Debian packages to provide automatic
> upgrades for PostGIS-enabled databases (see [1]). Does anyone object
> to this? 
> 
> Do you consider to adopt this upstream?
> 
> Thanks in advance, and have a nice weekend!
> 
> Martin
> 
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/351571
> 
> -- 
> Martin Pitt        http://www.piware.de
> Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntu.com
> Debian Developer   http://www.debian.org
> 
> In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?

[ Attachment, skipping... ]
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  SRA OSS, Inc.   http://www.sraoss.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-03-01 00:57:26
Subject: Re: Prepared Xacts and Vacuum question
Previous:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2006-03-01 00:48:05
Subject: Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group