Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Automatic free space map filling

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Automatic free space map filling
Date: 2006-02-28 22:47:25
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing wrote:

> Due to current implementation of vacuum,
> you have to abandon continuous vacuuming during vacuum of bigtable, but
> i have written and submitted to "patches" list a patch which allows
> vacuums not to block each other out, this is stalled due to Tom's
> "unesyness" about its possible hidden effects, but it should be
> available from "patches" list to anyone in distress :p

Do you use it in production?  Have you noticed any ill effects?

Alvaro Herrera                      
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Lukas SmithDate: 2006-02-28 23:02:55
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] temporary indexes
Previous:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2006-02-28 22:42:37
Subject: Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group