Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 02:49:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Perhaps we should make a concerted effort to split the libpq docs into a
> > section "for programmers" vs one "for users", the latter part covering
> > the libpq behavior that is interesting to users of a libpq-based app.
> > .pgpass, pg_service, the environment vars, SSL behavior, maybe some
> > other things belong in the "for users" part.
> +1. Is there a docs TODO?
Added to TODO:
* Split out libpq pgpass and environment documentation sections
to make it easier for non-developers to find
Looking at the existing manual, how do we do this? Do we make separate
libpq-programming and a libpq-runtime sections?
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Amit Kulkarni||Date: 2006-03-02 14:40:07|
|Subject: Interactive comments for major versions|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-02-25 04:29:25|
|Subject: Re: Error correction to FAQ|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-02-28 19:49:31|
|Subject: Re: character encoding in StartupMessage |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-02-28 19:45:05|
|Subject: Re: Zeroing damaged pages |