Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: localpipe

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: localpipe
Date: 2006-02-27 17:31:16
Message-ID: 200602271831.17873.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Hm, easily mixed up with localhost, which uses a socket too. But we
> don't have the space for 'local unix socket' either.

The official terms are such that sockets in the file system namespace 
are AF_LOCAL (or AF_UNIX), and sockets in the Internet namespace are 
AF_INET.  So using "local (domain) socket" or "Unix (domain) socket" 
would be reasonable.  (Both are used by PostgreSQL.)  A pipe on the 
other hand is created by the pipe() function and does not have a socket 
or a namespace since it is internal to the creating process, which is 
the distinguishing characteristic between a pipe and a socket.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-02-27 17:36:19
Subject: Re: German translation
Previous:From: OpenMacNewsDate: 2006-02-27 17:15:52
Subject: Re: Buildproblems on OSX 10.3 due to libxml2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group