Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

wal sync method

From: Evgeny Gridasov <eugrid(at)fpm(dot)kubsu(dot)ru>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: wal sync method
Date: 2006-02-27 12:08:19
Message-ID: 20060227150819.48e48a85.eugrid@fpm.kubsu.ru (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Hi everybody!

Which wal sync method is the fastest under linux 2.6.x?
I'm using RAID-10 (JFS filesystem), 2xXEON, 4 Gb RAM.

I've tried to switch to open_sync which seems to work 
faster than default fdatasync, but is it crash-safe?

-- 
Evgeny Gridasov
Software Engineer 
I-Free, Russia

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Javier SomozaDate: 2006-02-27 12:29:19
Subject: Re: wal sync method
Previous:From: Tino WildenhainDate: 2006-02-27 10:12:57
Subject: Re: fsync and battery-backed caches

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Javier SomozaDate: 2006-02-27 12:29:19
Subject: Re: wal sync method
Previous:From: Qingqing ZhouDate: 2006-02-27 09:33:38
Subject: Re: TOAST compression

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group