Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Resurrecting some old patches

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Resurrecting some old patches
Date: 2006-02-25 15:00:26
Message-ID: 20060225150026.GA22924@svana.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:15:39PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Aren't they in the 8.2 hold queue that I have not processed yet:
> 
> 	http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold

Hmm yeah. Didn't know about that page.

The first is ok but the second no longer applies cleanly to HEAD so I
posted an update. There's no particular point reviewing the old patch
since psql changed quite a bit between now and then.

If you somehow mark the held queue so people look at that email and the
new patch rather than the old one, that'd be great.

Have a nice day,
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-02-25 15:17:20
Subject: Re: What's with this lib suffix?
Previous:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2006-02-25 13:20:36
Subject: Re: What's with this lib suffix?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group