On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 02:49:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Perhaps we should make a concerted effort to split the libpq docs into a
> section "for programmers" vs one "for users", the latter part covering
> the libpq behavior that is interesting to users of a libpq-based app.
> .pgpass, pg_service, the environment vars, SSL behavior, maybe some
> other things belong in the "for users" part.
+1. Is there a docs TODO?
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Robert Treat||Date: 2006-02-20 03:39:12|
|Subject: docbook xml primer|
|Previous:||From: Martijn van Oosterhout||Date: 2006-02-18 20:40:04|
|Subject: Re: Config file for psql|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Martijn van Oosterhout||Date: 2006-02-19 17:29:49|
|Subject: Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString()|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-02-19 17:13:48|
|Subject: Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString() |