Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rick Gigger <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup
Date: 2006-02-14 06:22:13
Message-ID: 200602140722.15168.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I used your suggestion and renamed "online backup" to "incremental
> backup", and added a mention that many database vendors call it
> "online backup".

Consistency would then demand that the other two be renamed to "full 
backup".  I think we had better suggestions earlier.


-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2006-02-14 18:29:16
Subject: missing 8.1.2 release notes
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-02-14 04:03:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2006-02-14 08:30:20
Subject: FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed from Make failure to Contrib failure
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-02-14 04:03:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Jens-Wolfhard SchickeDate: 2006-02-14 07:59:47
Subject: Re: BUG #2246: Bad malloc interactions: ecpg, openssl
Previous:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2006-02-14 05:17:39
Subject: Re: Free WAL caches on switching segments

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group