Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rick Gigger <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup
Date: 2006-02-14 06:22:13
Message-ID: 200602140722.15168.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I used your suggestion and renamed "online backup" to "incremental
> backup", and added a mention that many database vendors call it
> "online backup".

Consistency would then demand that the other two be renamed to "full
backup". I think we had better suggestions earlier.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2006-02-14 18:29:16 missing 8.1.2 release notes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-14 04:03:03 Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-02-14 08:30:20 FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed from Make failure to Contrib failure
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-14 04:03:03 Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jens-Wolfhard Schicke 2006-02-14 07:59:47 Re: BUG #2246: Bad malloc interactions: ecpg, openssl
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2006-02-14 05:17:39 Re: Free WAL caches on switching segments