Greetings,

* Stephen Frost (sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net) wrote:
>   I realize it's not entirely fair (given that it was years ago) to ask
>   this, but, anyone happen to know why the patch wasn't accepted?  It
>   almost patched cleanly against current HEAD even.  I went ahead and
>   made the few changes by hand that didn't apply cleanly and it compiled
>   just fine; attached patch is against current HEAD and should apply
>   cleanly.

  I've now tested this patch at home w/ 8.2HEAD and it seems to fix the
  bug.  I plan on testing it under 8.1.2 at work tommorow with
  mod_auth_krb5, etc, and expect it'll work there.  Assuming all goes
  well and unless someone objects I'll forward the patch to -patches.
  It'd be great to have this fixed as it'll allow us to use Kerberos to
  authenticate to phppgadmin and other web-based tools which use
  Postgres.

  	Thanks!

		Stephen

In response to

• Krb5 & multiple DB connections at 2006-02-03 02:19:20 from Stephen Frost

Responses

• Re: Krb5 & multiple DB connections at 2006-02-05 20:20:12 from Stephen Frost

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2006-02-05 18:29:56
	Subject: Re: drop if exists remainder
Previous:	From: Richard Hills	Date: 2006-02-05 17:13:29
	Subject: Re: Shared memory and memory context question

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2006-02-05 18:29:56
	Subject: Re: drop if exists remainder
Previous:	From: Joachim Wieland	Date: 2006-02-05 17:24:04
	Subject: Re: TODO-Item: TRUNCATE ... CASCADE