Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> > You'll still need to run the postmaster frmo pg_ctl to get the "run as
> > admin" part. The only part that could be moved is the Job Object for
> > management. And you're normally not going to need that one when you're
> > not running as a service. Maybe sometimes, but I doubt it's worth it. If
> > we could solve the run-as-admin inside the postmaster it might be
> > different, but AFAICS we can't.
> 
> Yeah, I thought we'd agreed that the patch was fine as-is.

Fine. I just wanted to make sure the decions was being made in terms of
logic, rather than Win32 cruft avoidance.  The previous discussion was
not clear on this point.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

• Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 at 2006-02-03 15:29:22 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Mark Dilger	Date: 2006-02-03 18:46:07
	Subject: Re: Passing arguments to views
Previous:	From: Josh Berkus	Date: 2006-02-03 18:35:28
	Subject: Re: Passing arguments to views

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2006-02-03 18:50:56
	Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in ecpg and psql
Previous:	From: Josh Berkus	Date: 2006-02-03 18:20:30
	Subject: Re: Multiple logical databases