Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Multiple logical databases

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Multiple logical databases
Date: 2006-02-02 23:41:16
Message-ID: 200602030041.17427.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Mark Woodward wrote:
> From an administration perspective, a single point of admin would
> seem like a logical and valuable objective, no?

I don't understand why you are going out of your way to separate your 
databases (for misinformed reasons, it appears) and then want to design 
a way to centrally control them so they can all fail together.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Chris CampbellDate: 2006-02-03 00:12:35
Subject: Passing arguments to views
Previous:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2006-02-02 23:12:25
Subject: Re: Multiple logical databases

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2006-02-03 02:19:20
Subject: Krb5 & multiple DB connections
Previous:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2006-02-02 23:12:25
Subject: Re: Multiple logical databases

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group