| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Multiple logical databases |
| Date: | 2006-02-02 23:41:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200602030041.17427.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Mark Woodward wrote:
> From an administration perspective, a single point of admin would
> seem like a logical and valuable objective, no?
I don't understand why you are going out of your way to separate your
databases (for misinformed reasons, it appears) and then want to design
a way to centrally control them so they can all fail together.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Campbell | 2006-02-03 00:12:35 | Passing arguments to views |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2006-02-02 23:12:25 | Re: Multiple logical databases |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-02-03 02:19:20 | Krb5 & multiple DB connections |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2006-02-02 23:12:25 | Re: Multiple logical databases |