Dave Page wrote:
> Oops. 8.0, 8.1 and dev failed on Snake last night :-(
Fixed in all branches, patch attached. I was unclear how the const was
going to behave for Win32 but it should be fine now.
Basically the const comes in via parameter, and we used to make a
non-const copy just for Win32; now we always do, but we still return it
as a const.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /D
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PG Build Farm [mailto:pgbuildfarm-web(at)hosting-two(dot)commandprompt(dot)com]
> Sent: Wed 2/1/2006 2:08 AM
> To: pgbuildfarm-status-chngs(at)pgfoundry(dot)org; pgbuildfarm-status-green(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
> Subject: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch REL8_0_STABLE Status changed from OK to Make failure
>
>
> The PGBuildfarm member snake had the following event on branch REL8_0_STABLE:
>
> Status changed from OK to Make failure
>
> The snapshot timestamp for the build that triggered this notification is: 2006-02-01 02:05:48
>
> The specs of this machine are:
> OS: Windows / Server 2003 SP1
> Arch: i686
> Comp: gcc / 3.4.2
>
> For more information, see http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=snake&br=REL8_0_STABLE
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Dave Page | Date: 2006-02-01 14:05:09 |
| Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch REL8_0_STABLE Status changed from OK to Make failure |
| Previous: | From: Pavel Stehule | Date: 2006-02-01 11:43:31 |
| Subject: Re: system triggers |
pgsql-patches by date
| Next: | From: Andrew Dunstan | Date: 2006-02-01 12:55:39 |
| Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2221: Bad delimiters allowed in COPY ... |
| Previous: | From: Junji TERAMOTO | Date: 2006-02-01 10:44:05 |
| Subject: Re: BTree vacuum before page splitting |