Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> It could read all the SET variables in at startup?

Right, but do we want to do that even if they never ask for a tab
completion?  I think the easiest might be to just save the list on first
tab call.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


> 
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Some time ago, the tab completion code for the SET command was changed to read 
> > the list of available settings from the pg_settings table.  This means that 
> > by the time you're done completing SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION, you've already 
> > sent a query and the command will be disallowed.  It's not a major issue, but 
> > I figured I'd mention it since it confused me a while ago.  If someone has an 
> > ingenious plan for working around this, let me know.
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

• Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION at 2006-02-01 01:15:47 from Christopher Kings-Lynne

Responses

• Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION at 2006-02-01 01:32:42 from Rod Taylor

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Rod Taylor	Date: 2006-02-01 01:32:42
	Subject: Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION
Previous:	From: Christopher Kings-Lynne	Date: 2006-02-01 01:15:47
	Subject: Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION