Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Policy on schema-qualified names

From: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Policy on schema-qualified names
Date: 2006-01-31 19:43:21
Message-ID: 20060131194321.GA5959@mcknight.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:46:42PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The direction that we ought to be going in is to add separate fields to
> error reports that contain just the names of the relevant objects (without
> any other decoration).  This is needed anyway to allow client-side
> programs to extract the information without having to parse human-readable
> text messages ... and IIRC it's required by some part of the SQL spec,
> too.

Agreed. I didn't know about that part but with this in mind it would be a
waste of time to check all of the the messages at this time and make them
conform in some way.


Thanks for the explanation,
Joachim

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-01-31 19:52:05
Subject: Re: VACUUM Question
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-01-31 19:11:51
Subject: Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group