Re: -X flag in pg_dump

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Subject: Re: -X flag in pg_dump
Date: 2006-01-26 21:31:09
Message-ID: 200601262131.k0QLV9s01280@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> > If all the -X flags come in a long form as well, then what use is the
> > -X at all? Why would one want to use -X disable-triggers instead of
> > --disable-triggers ?
>
> This was added before we had portable long options. I suppose we could
> phase it out.

Yes, I think you are right.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-01-26 21:37:27 Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess
Previous Message Chris Browne 2006-01-26 21:14:45 Re: VACUUM Question