From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Andrus <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Different exponent in error messages |
Date: | 2006-01-25 17:54:22 |
Message-ID: | 200601251754.k0PHsM704930@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Applied.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> > > I think this is what Andrus is seeing:
> >
> > > test=> CREATE TABLE foo (n numeric(9,3));
> > > CREATE TABLE
> > > test=> INSERT INTO foo VALUES (1000000);
> > > ERROR: numeric field overflow
> > > DETAIL: The absolute value is greater than or equal to 10^6 for field with precision 9, scale 3.
> > > test=> INSERT INTO foo VALUES (1000000000);
> > > ERROR: numeric field overflow
> > > DETAIL: The absolute value is greater than or equal to 10^9 for field with precision 9, scale 3.
> >
> > Hm, I thought I tested that same case, but I must've messed up somehow.
> >
> > Anyway, the code seems to be intentionally reporting the log10 of the
> > actual input value, not the limiting log10 for the field size. This
> > behavior goes at least as far back as PG 7.0, so I'm disinclined to
> > change it. We could talk about altering the message wording though,
> > if you have a suggestion for something you'd find less confusing.
> > Pre-7.4 versions say
> >
> > ERROR: overflow on numeric ABS(value) >= 10^9 for field with precision 9 scale 3
> >
> > so it looks like we just fixed the grammar during the 7.4 message
> > wording cleanup, without reflecting about whether the meaning was clear.
>
> Yes, this message clearly needs help. Here is what I developed:
>
> test=> CREATE TABLE foo (n numeric(9,3));
> CREATE TABLE
> test=> INSERT INTO foo VALUES (10000000);
> ERROR: numeric field overflow
> DETAIL: A field with precision 9, scale 3 must have an absolute value less than 10^6.
>
> and the 10^6 is based on the max digits to the left of the decimal
> point, not the input value.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
> Index: src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.88
> diff -c -c -r1.88 numeric.c
> *** src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c 22 Nov 2005 18:17:23 -0000 1.88
> --- src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c 23 Jan 2006 20:00:54 -0000
> ***************
> *** 3206,3213 ****
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
> errmsg("numeric field overflow"),
> ! errdetail("The absolute value is greater than or equal to 10^%d for field with precision %d, scale %d.",
> ! ddigits - 1, precision, scale)));
> break;
> }
> ddigits -= DEC_DIGITS;
> --- 3206,3213 ----
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
> errmsg("numeric field overflow"),
> ! errdetail("A field with precision %d, scale %d must have an absolute value less than 10^%d.",
> ! precision, scale, maxdigits)));
> break;
> }
> ddigits -= DEC_DIGITS;
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | MargaretGillon | 2006-01-25 17:55:58 | Re: Constraint that compares and limits field values |
Previous Message | andrew | 2006-01-25 17:52:52 | Re: user defined function |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2006-01-25 18:07:36 | Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-25 17:33:51 | Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb |