Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb
Date: 2006-01-25 17:07:18
Message-ID: 200601251707.k0PH7I126387@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> > We have the same options with reindexdb, for example.
>
> reindexdb and friends inherited that option from psql. On a green
> field, they probably wouldn't have it. psql has more complex
> semantics, so it's not clear whether that's the same thing.
>
> > I think a command line options is better and required.
>
> I think we need more proof of that than a use case involving taking
> screen shots.

Agreed on both points.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2006-01-25 17:10:42 Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb
Previous Message Robert Treat 2006-01-25 17:01:13 Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2006-01-25 17:10:42 Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb
Previous Message Robert Treat 2006-01-25 17:01:13 Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing