Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb
Date: 2006-01-25 17:07:18
Message-ID: 200601251707.k0PH7I126387@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> > We have the same options with reindexdb, for example.
> 
> reindexdb and friends inherited that option from psql.  On a green 
> field, they probably wouldn't have it.  psql has more complex 
> semantics, so it's not clear whether that's the same thing.
> 
> > I think a command line options is better and required.
> 
> I think we need more proof of that than a use case involving taking 
> screen shots.

Agreed on both points.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Devrim GUNDUZDate: 2006-01-25 17:10:42
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2006-01-25 17:01:13
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Devrim GUNDUZDate: 2006-01-25 17:10:42
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2006-01-25 17:01:13
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group