Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb
Date: 2006-01-25 15:32:34
Message-ID: 200601251632.35415.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> We have the same options with reindexdb, for example.

reindexdb and friends inherited that option from psql.  On a green 
field, they probably wouldn't have it.  psql has more complex 
semantics, so it's not clear whether that's the same thing.

> I think a command line options is better and required.

I think we need more proof of that than a use case involving taking 
screen shots.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-01-25 16:18:44
Subject: Re: Suggestions for post-mortem...
Previous:From: Devrim GUNDUZDate: 2006-01-25 15:26:53
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-01-25 16:28:04
Subject: Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb
Previous:From: Devrim GUNDUZDate: 2006-01-25 15:26:53
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Adding a --quiet option to initdb

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group