| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Brandon Black <blblack(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #2204: Feature Req: Unique output column names |
| Date: | 2006-01-24 22:21:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20060124222110.GA29057@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> > It would be nice to have this text in HTML or info format. This PDF
> > mess is really awkward.
>
> Yeah, that's why I tend to look at SQL92 or SQL99 first ... I have those
> drafts in plain-ASCII format, which is so much easier to grep and copy.
> Would love to lay my hands on plain-ASCII SQL2003.
What I use is the text version I extracting using pdf2text (or something
like that). While the formatting is very awkward, it is at least
greppable.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/CTMLCN8V17R4
The easiest way to resolve [trivial code guidelines disputes] is to fire
one or both of the people involved. (Damian Conway)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brandon Black | 2006-01-24 23:23:21 | Re: BUG #2204: Feature Req: Unique output column names |
| Previous Message | Jean-Pierre Pelletier | 2006-01-24 16:56:45 | Re: BUG #2178: NOT IN command don't work |