Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing
Date: 2006-01-23 17:00:51
Message-ID: 20060123170051.GM20182@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:51:36AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> This is clearly better, IMNSHO. I did wonder about postgresqld or
> postgresd or some such - many server programs end in "d" or ".d" to
> distinguish them from client programs. But probably just "postgres" is
> best.

Or postgresql if we want to be consistent...
</nitpick>
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-01-23 17:05:49 Re: ROLLBACK triggers?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-01-23 16:51:36 Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-01-23 20:02:22 Re: [GENERAL] Different exponent in error messages
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-01-23 16:51:36 Re: [PATCHES] postmaster/postgres merge for testing