Re: 3WARE Card performance boost?

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Benjamin Arai <barai(at)cs(dot)ucr(dot)edu>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 3WARE Card performance boost?
Date: 2006-01-18 23:05:32
Message-ID: 20060118230532.GA17896@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:24:17AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Because 3ware does not make a midrange card that has a battery backed
> cache :). That is the only reason. 3ware makes good stuff.

Why worry about battery-backup if he's running with fsync off?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Crozier 2006-01-18 23:36:04 Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum (off-topic?)
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-01-18 23:02:30 Re: Simple Question of Performance ILIKE or Lower