Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint
Date: 2006-01-16 20:49:55
Message-ID: 20060116204955.GC32100@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On 1/16/06, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> what about lower the context part of the messages for plpgsql
> functions? that seems debug info for me... just an idea ;)
>
> pruebas=# select prueba();
> ERROR: new row for relation "foo" violates check constraint "foo_fld_check"
> CONTEXT: SQL statement "insert into foo values (-1)"
> PL/pgSQL function "prueba" line 2 at SQL statement

It's not debug info in the sense of the DEBUG error levels. These are
meant as debug info of the server itself, like, say, a transaction
started. The CONTEXT line is exactly that, context information.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.advogato.org/person/alvherre
"World domination is proceeding according to plan" (Andrew Morton)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-01-16 20:52:01 Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem?
Previous Message Jonathan Gardner 2006-01-16 20:45:37 Re: source documentation tool doxygen

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2006-01-16 20:59:45 Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2006-01-16 20:44:25 Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint