Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > > Basically meaning your idea of update while
> > > > EXCLUSIVE/PRESERVE/STABLE is happening is never going to be
> > > > implemented because it is just too hard to do, and too prone to
> > > > error.
> > >
> > > What I figured. Never hurts to ask though. :):)
> > Actually, it does hurt because it generates discussion volume for no
> > purpose.
> Surely you didn't mean that the way it sounded?
Actually, I did. Throwing out random ideas that have little useful
purpose and just confuse the discussion is not helpful.
"Wouldn't it be nice if PostgreSQL allowed commands to be typed
backwards so people could program by looking at the screen through a
mirror" is not helpful.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-01-04 04:32:01|
|Subject: Re: TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-01-04 04:17:16|
|Subject: Re: Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX? |