Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
Date: 2006-01-04 04:24:09
Message-ID: 200601040424.k044O9k13992@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
> 
> > > > Basically meaning your idea of update while
> > > > EXCLUSIVE/PRESERVE/STABLE is happening is never going to be
> > > > implemented because it is just too hard to do, and too prone to
> > > > error.
> > >
> > > What I figured. Never hurts to ask though. :):)
> >
> > Actually, it does hurt because it generates discussion volume for no
> > purpose.
> 
> Zowie!!
> 
> Surely you didn't mean that the way it sounded?

Actually, I did.  Throwing out random ideas that have little useful
purpose and just confuse the discussion is not helpful.

"Wouldn't it be nice if PostgreSQL allowed commands to be typed
backwards so people could program by looking at the screen through a
mirror" is not helpful.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-01-04 04:32:01
Subject: Re: TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-01-04 04:17:16
Subject: Re: Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group